翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Costanzo Balleri ・ Costanzo Cattani ・ Costanzo Celestini ・ Costanzo Ciano ・ Costanzo Family House ・ Costanzo Festa ・ Costanzo I Sforza ・ Costanzo II Sforza ・ Costanzo Picco ・ Costanzo Porta ・ Costanzo Preve ・ Costanzo Sforza ・ Costanzo Varolio ・ Costar ・ CoStar Group ・ CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc. ・ Costarainera ・ Costarcha ・ Costard ・ Costaros ・ COSTART ・ Costas ・ Costas Andreou ・ Costas array ・ Costas Aslanidis ・ Costas Azariadis ・ Costas Costa ・ Costas del Tacuarí ・ Costas Douzinas ・ Costas Droutsas Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc. ''CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.'', 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision about whether LoopNet should be held directly liable for CoStar’s copyrighted photographs posted by LoopNet’s subscribers on LoopNet’s website. The majority of the court ruled that since LoopNet was an Internet service provider ("ISP") that automatically and passively stored material at the direction of users, LoopNet did not copy the material in violation of the Copyright Act. The majority of the court also held that the screening process by a LoopNet employee before the images were stored and displayed did not alter the passivity of LoopNet. Justice Gregory dissented, stating that LoopNet had engaged in active, volitional conduct because of its screening process. ==Facts== CoStar was a provider of commercial real estate information. Its database included a large collection of photographs of commercial properties. LoopNet was an ISP whose website allowed subscribers to post listings of commercial real estate on the Internet. LoopNet did not post real estate listings, but enabled users to post listings that contained text messages and photographs. Prior to CoStar's original complaint about copyright infringement, when a photograph was uploaded into LoopNet's system by a subscriber, the photograph was made public immediately. Subsequent to CoStar's complaint, LoopNet initiated a system of review, which transferred uploads to one of LoopNet's internal computers for review. A LoopNet employee then reviewed the photograph to ensure that (1) it was an image of commercial real estate, and (2) it was not an obviously copyrighted image. CoStar claimed that by September 2001, it had found over 300 of its copyrighted images on LoopNet's website posted by LoopNet's subscribers. LoopNet had about 33,000 photographs posted by its subscribers at that time. LoopNet responded to takedown notices from Costar. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.